Maintenance treatment

This topic contains 9 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by  stanley-1960 5 hours, 53 minutes ago.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #150500

    brewy36
    Participant

    Hi everyone,
    Is there anyone out there in remisson following a SCT, who isn’t taking any meds at all? My SCT was successful and I started on lenalidomide but had to stop it as it was affecting my platelet count. It’s taken 9 months for them to recover so my consultant says he would prefer me not to restart. I was hoping could start on a lower dose but he says he doesn’t want to risk it again as I’m doing so well without it. Whilst I’m happy that he says my results are all good and I am fit and well, that little niggle at the back of my head is that Myeloma is bound to come back quicker if I’m not taking anything? Is it common to be in remission without taking any maintenance treatment at all?

    #150502

    derbyshirelass
    Participant

    Hi Brewy36,
    Re sct and lack of maintenance drugs, my hubby had Sct in 2018 and the maintenance drugs where not available then , he had 40months remission before starting 2nd line treatment, which he is still on.
    Hope this helps a little to squash that little niggle.
    Best wishes

    #150503

    brewy36
    Participant

    Thank you for that Derbyshirelass. It is really good to hear that your husband did so well without being on any maintenance treatment. Hope he continues to do well in the future.

    #150504

    mulberry
    Participant

    Statistically post SCT patients do have longer remissions if they have maintenance, the uk Myeloma X1 trial demonstrated that without maintenance patients relapsed after 30 months, with 10g lenalidomide maintenance the average was 58 months. However none of us are statistics, and it’s clear that some of us don’t need maintenance to have long remissions after SCT, it’s just not clear, except in hindsight, which patients do (or don’t). Until comparatively recently the NHS did not give maintenance after SCT (I think 2021). There are a number of patients in our local myeloma support group who had SCTs before the change in protocol who are still in remission without maintenance. One had SCT 6.5 years ago,another 5 years ago. Both have probably benefited significantly from this long drug free period. I was keen to have len maintenance after SCT in 2019 so I imported it (with my consultants knowledge). I couldn’t tolerate a 10g dose and relapsed on 5g after 50 months. It’s all a bit of a gamble. If you had a 4 drug induction (so including daratumumab) your expectations for remission should be significantly better than it was for the 3 drugs tested in the Myeloma X1 trial. Len maintenance does have side effects for most of us & there are very good options now for later treatment which I guess contributes to your consultants advice, but you could ask for a second opinion.

    #150505

    brewy36
    Participant

    Thank you for that Mulberry. I know there are no hard and fast rules when it comes to MM and we’re all so different! But it is good to know that at least it’s possible to have a good length of remission without maintenance.I hope I’m one of the lucky ones!
    P.S. yes I did have 4 drug induction.

    #150506

    rebeccaR
    Participant

    Hi, I am just over 11years post Sct with no maintenance drugs. I had poor kidney function so not suitable for trials which was then the only way to get maintenance drugs post SCT. I also have high risk genetics! If I’d had maintenance I would be posting now attributing the 11 years to maintenance! This shows the individuality of myeloma and the fact that you will never really know if the maintenance gave you the remission or not. I was glad to be off drugs tbh and my consultant saw it as using up another drug option earlier – tho this was 11 years ago. I’ve really enjoyed being drug free and know there are an arsenal of drugs available now when needed again.
    Rebecca

    #150507

    brewy36
    Participant

    Hi rebeccaR,
    Wow 11 years, that’s amazing. You must be made of strong stuff. Long may it continue. Thanks so much for sharing your positive experience.

    #150514

    gg
    Participant

    HiBrewy
    I had my sct cancelled due to a severe reaction after 4 cycles on the RADAR medical trial. This was supplemented with a further 4 cycles of chemo in which because I wanted have the lenalidomide I had to provide that myself privately as the NHS would not supply it as part of my ongoing treatment.
    result was a success, I have now had 13 months of full remission and things are still good.
    My consultant was very keen for me not to take any maintenance drugs whilst in remission as the concensus was that the effectiveness of lenalidomide as maintenance will gradually reduce and by the time I get to the first relapse it would be totally ineffective, thus removing an important drug which would be part of the regime for the relapse treatment.
    Like you things are good for me at the moment, and long may it last.
    Take care and I hope things stay good for you.
    Hope this helps,
    Graham

    #150515

    brewy36
    Participant

    Thanks for that Graham,
    I am hearing more stories about the effectiveness of lenalidomide reducing the longer you use it, so what our consultants said makes sense. Thanks for sharing your experience and good luck for the future.
    Brewy.

    #150735

    stanley-1960
    Participant

    Hi all,
    Not been on for a couple of years but find this post interesting. My story SCT 2014 drug free then relapsed after 6 years. Second SCT 2021 with 10mg of lenalidomide maintenance post transplant. Like Rebecca 11+years from diagnosis. After the second transplant I felt a little pressurised into the maintenance route as I had pushed very hard for the transplant. I would have preferred the no maintenance route again and see how long I would have got to relapse. It’s now coming up to 4 years of lenalidomide 10mg With a year of 25mg previous to get me ready for transplant. My consultant wants me to stop the maintenance due to constant chest infections in the winter. My bloods look ok so not sure about this. I’ve looked at the results from the myeloma 11 phase III trial
    Patients who were MRD-negative at the time of maintenance randomization showed evidence of a significant benefit for continuing lenalidomide beyond 2 years, but the difference lost statistical significance beyond 3 years. In contrast, MRD-positive patients gained a much greater benefit from lenalidomide maintenance at all time points.
    I am not sure if I’m MRD – or + with my Kappa just around 30 but my ratio has been normal 1.45 post transplant. One thing I’ve learned is that you can be MRD – with abnormal free lights. So the question is which one am I. If I’m negative it makes sense to stop.
    Stay safe all
    Stanley

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.