Hi folks,
Stephen has just started his 5th cycle of Velcade which he has been receiving subcutaneously. All has gone well so far and his side effects have been minimal. However when he went into our local hospital on Tuesday for his usual injection he was told that Velcade c ould no longer be given by subcutaneous injection. He received his dose as an injection intravenously, not an infusion, so it did not take long. However I assume he now risks the possibility of great side effects.
Apparently this has come about due to an edict from the MRHA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency). The administration of Velcade subcutaneously has not been licenced but I know many people have recieved this way so I am not sure what has suddenly changed. I wondered if anyone else had come across this or if maybe Ellen knew anything about it. It seems a great shame, especially if more people can tolerate velcade if given in this way.
Who should we lobby to bring about a change for the better? I think I know the answer, it's good old NICE again.
The good news for Steve however, is that after 5 cycles his paraproteins are down to less than 2, undetectable. We go to see the contsultant early next month to consider our next steps. I know Steve is wondering about an allo SCT, he is one of four, but worries that he is too old at 55. Does anyone have any thoughts about this?
Thank you for youe help and I hope no one is being deprived of sub cut velcade that really needs it,
Love Mari xx