Reduced intensity allogeneic transplant

This topic contains 5 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by  hollym7171 8 years, 2 months ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #126815

    hollym7171
    Participant

    Hi

    I was diagnosed with MM in April 2015 after going for a routine eye test that showed abnormalities and lead to me being referred to my GP and later a haematologist. As a fit and healthy 43 year old it came as a massive shock.

    I started treatment straight away and after 4 cycles of VTD I had my first stem cell transplant in October 2015. I’m delighted to say that it all went well and I’m in remission. However, just before Christmas my consultant told me that I have high risk MM (17p deletion) and suggested I should seriously consider a reduced intensity allogeneic transplant.

    Having read a lot about the allo I am very nervous about agreeing to it. My consultant has told me I can be treated the conventional way but he hasn’t specifically said what this is although I have asked. I have spoken to my specialist nurse and seen my Consultant again but I am still so unsure. I have a young family and the risks with the allo appear massive. Also, my Consultant has said it would be preferable to have the transplant by mid April this year, so not long.

    I would be grateful to hear from anyone who is, or has been in my position, or has had an allo. I know very few allo transplants are performed in the UK but I’m hoping someone will be able to share their exprience with me.

     

    #126818

    annlynn
    Participant

    sorry cant give much in this post. this was discussed when i was diagnosed at 59. not sure if 60 is the. cutt off time ? i only had one btother that could have possibly been a donnor but i looked. at risks and stuck with stem cell transplant. ive been in re.mision eighteen month but as they say the dissision is entirely. yours good luck with watever you deside. xx annlynn

    #126827

    kjlowes
    Participant

    Hi Holly, I was diagnosed in July 2014 at age 49 and have had 6 months CDT followed by an auto SCT in April 2015 and am now recovering from an allo which I had in Oct 2015.

    Like yourself I was in remission following my auto but on speaking with my consultant at Manchester and weighing up all the statistics I opted for an allo to hopefully give me further years of being drug free and having a relatively good quality of life. The allo is nowhere near as harsh as the auto and I have had very little GVHD but am currently being weaned off the anti-rejection drugs so still at risk of a bad reaction.

    <span style=”line-height: 1.5;”>I’m happy to speak to you direct about my treatment if it will help your decision. Please feel free to contact me direct at karenlowes@btinternet.com. </span>

     

     

     

     

    #126900

    willjames2
    Participant

    Hi Holly,

    My name is Scott and I’ve not been on here for a while. I came on today to see if there was any information on the Immunotherapy treatment mentioned in the news today.

    Anyway I digress…I have had both the Auto and Allo (RIC – Reduced Intensity Conditioning). I was diagnosed in Aug 2013 at the age of 41. At the time I had broken vertebrae in the lower back and could hardly walk. I was diagnosed with lambda light chain myeloma at ISS Stage 1. My light chains were approx 1500 when diagnosed (which to be fair is quite low considering other patients I have read about). I was randomised for CTD and had 4 x 21 day cycles but my light chains had reduced to approx 26 after the first month so I had a really good response. I had my auto in the Jan/Feb 2014 and then 6 or so months later I had my allo (which I believe they call a Tandem Treatment). My consultant told me that I would probably get the best response and longest possible chance of remission with this tandem treatment. My allo was in June 2015 and my now second birthday is 26th June (the day I received my Donor Stem Cells).

    My donor was MUD (matched unrelated donor) with 10/10 tissue type and CMV negative. I was lucky in getting this donor so soon and I must say, that as previous people have said, that the auto was worse for me than the allo. With the auto, I spent 9 days in Hospital and was fatigued for a good few months later due to the Melphlan, it really wiped me out. With the allo (SEATTLE PROTOCOL) it was done as an outpatient and I did really well (however I was told that the allo is generally well tolerated). I did have a few lingering colds (4- 6 weeks) at a time and a few other minor issues such as lack of saliva for 6 months (I think due to the dose of radiotherapy I had at the start of the allo treatment). However, this cleared up gradually after I came off the cylcosporin completely. I now feel really great with hardly any GVHD and I have a check up once every two months. I still have Zometa monthly though. I was back at work more or less full time in approx 3 -4 months after the allo (however I wouldn’t rush back if I had to do it all again).

    I did my homework initially, however, as you said there is not a great deal of information out there for allo’s because not too many are done. I did get offered the myeoblative (full allo) but considered that too risky with the mortality rates that were mentioned at the time, so I opted for RIC allo and then put my fate in the hands of Science to help us all find a cure in the near future. Sometimes I even forget that I have myeloma (although in remission) and live a pretty much normal life.

    Would I opt for the allo again? based on the donor profile I was lucky to receive…I would, all day long. However, the decision is yours alone to make after careful consideration with your consultant.

    Good luck…and remember your young and fit and so that is in your favour. Be strong in mind and this will help you a great deal.

    If you need to contact me direct then please don’t hesitate to e mail me on scott.mckenzie2@btinternet.com

    Kind Regards

    Scott

    #126901

    willjames2
    Participant

    Holly,

    Sorry, correction my Allo was done in June 2014 (not 2015 as stated above…typo).

    Kind Regards

    Scott

    #126929

    hollym7171
    Participant

    Hi

    Thank you for your comments, they have really helped. <span style=”line-height: 1.5;”>It’s so reassuring to read some really positive feedback about allo’s. I wish you all the best.</span>

    I saw another Consultant for a second opinion on Monday and he has  a slightly different view to my Consultant. Although I’ve got 17p deletion he’s suggesting an allo after my first relapse, although I’d have to go through the awful auto again ;(  I have to say, knowing that I could have an allo at a later date is something I am seriously considering because I’m still not sure if I can take the risk of having an allo in the next couple of months.

    I’m seeing my consultant again today in the hope of getting a few more answers, and I’m going to ask him about the Immunotherapy mentioned in the news as well. Then it’s decision time!

    Regards.

    Holly

     

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

The topic ‘Reduced intensity allogeneic transplant’ is closed to new replies.