Hi Ann,
I completely agree with you on there not being an option when dealing with high risk myeloma if an allo graft is recommended. The problem for us is that there seems to be different trains of thought amongst consultants on whether an allo graft is a beneficial form of treatment when compared to new targeted treatments; so if the experts can’t agree then how can we make an informed decision? For me, risks aside, an allo graft was a more pro active approach in dealing with my form of myeloma as opposed to the reactive one of waiting for things to happen.
It must have been very disappointing to find your auto graft had not given you a good remission but try to remain positive as you move forward; VTD worked very well for me and got me ready for my auto graft in four cycles and there are many more combinations available if needed. Hopefully before you know it you’ll be getting the news that you have a matched donor and moving ahead towards your transplant.
Hi Linda,
Yes, initially I did not like the sound of an allo graft transplant but the more I learned about it and the reasons why I was being recommended for it, the more it made sense. Stem cells from a donor are there for a different reason than when you receive your own stem cell back after high dose chemo. Your own stem cells are used to recover your bone marrow whilst a donors stem cells are introduced in order to introduce the donors immune system which will fight the cancer cells. So definitely ask lots of questions, you will need to understand the role of graft versus host disease for instance and you should discuss in detail the risks and benefits of the treatment. Hopefully having a greater understanding will make the decision to go ahead less daunting.
So I’m back in London tomorrow for my third infusion, all is going well so far. Pity I can’t say the same about the trains though…